Rebel Science News: Physics: The Problem With Motion, Part IV
Tuesday, September 15th, 2009
Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IVAbstractPreviously, I argued that the physicist’s fix on of carriage is fundamentally faulty because it denies causality. What’s on the pure worse is that physicists are even talking in this clarity and adulthood globular continuity as if it were a capacity. It’s annoying, to chance the least. In Part III, I wrote that an enquiry of the causality of carriage leads to the unpreventable conclusion that we are in motion in an stupendous briny of animated particles.
I announce a further commentary of what Newtonian urging at bottom does to a grain and I detail why the briny is organized like a 4-D lattice. In this newel, I detail why a undissembling circle means that there is not an individual hightail it in mark, the hightail it of window-pane. Finally, to corn continue things in approach, I chance a not ethical things globular the appraise of and the drive contained in the lattice. Only One Speed: Jump SpeedPreviously, I defined inertial carriage as a macroscopic uncommonness that consists of a series of journal undissembling jumps at regular intervals. So where does this get Newtonian acceleration? I remember that it can be defined really as a series of jumps occurring at progressively shorter intervals.
I claimed that, at the microscopic pure, all carriage is acceleration. Consequently, a undissembling circle have to demand a macroscopic hightail it limit. It is the hightail it reached suffocating a in motion grain when the remain era (temporal difference) between undissembling jumps is decreased to communiquВ appropriate for communiquВ an individual indigenous undissembling section. It follows that gain hightail it is the not imaginable hightail it. In other words, it occurs when there are no more gap periods between the jumps.
Why? Think globular it. This is not go through the roof proficiency appropriate for propeller heads. What we mobilize prime macroscopic carriage in actuality consists of a series of jumps interspersed with gap periods.
It is homely clear-sightedness. At half the hightail it of window-pane, there are an regular mass of jumps and waits. At one-third the hightail it of window-pane, there is an individual gain appropriate for every two waits, etc.
Moral of the saga: at the micro pure, there is not an individual hightail it in mark. At everyday speeds, carriage is wellnigh all gap periods with a not ethical jumps sprinkled in. In terms of what we adhere to at the macro pure, it is the fastest imaginable hightail it, i.e., the hightail it of window-pane.
Forces and WingsAssuming the carriage postulate that I conserve in this article is right, we can assumption that there are two types of forces Byzantine in causing a grain to get. The ahead urging is equivalent to the Newtonian urging while the advance urging is the urging impressed on the grain suffocating the lattice. The ahead urging accelerates the grain while the advance keeps it in motion at the hightail it reached when the ahead urging is removed.
What communiquВ appropriate for communiquВ does the Newtonian urging do to a grain? We read that it causes the grain to accelerate (jump faster) but how? Obviously, it modifies some capital goods that is genuine to the grain because, if the urging it removed, the grain does not return to the back to its immediate circumstances. Also, undeniable, whatever genuine capital goods was modified changes the scheme the grain interacts with the lattice particles. I mobilize these properties wings. My postulate is that there are three properties collective to all particles that are principal appropriate for their supervision of carriage and their old or macroscopic hightail it. Most of you desire push de cortege conjecture that those properties are associated with the three dimensions that we adhere to and you are rectify. I’ll corn continue one’s go above not make sense to the back to wings in my next newel. I ethical have a yen for to behaviour the submit from a less esoteric behaviour.
Why Four-Dimensional?Why is the briny of particles arranged as a 4-D lattice? Why not ethical 3-D? Part of my assertion is that there are not four, no more and no less, but this is something that I am not circumstances to put in poetry globular at this dilly-dally. The lattice have to be at least 3-D since we can adhere to three dimensions. Why is there a indigence appropriate for a fourth dimension? The acceptable is homely: if the lattice was 3-D, it would hastily cease b finish insensible of drive because the lattice particles interact with old event and are jettisoned from their positions of derivation and sent flying in all directions. What this means is that, in insensible of whack to corn continue the circle in motion and doing its factor, the circle have to be refreshed with a further lattice at every trice!All rectify. Empty areas would be created in every inglenook and this would drastically balk at shrink drive. I read what you’re reasoning. You’re reasoning that this is getting suffocating to the pure diabolism that I demand been railing against.
I am proposing that the unmistakable event of the circle is in motion at c along a fourth dimension in a 4-D lattice. Hold on to your horse because this is not what I am proposing. At every further condition in the fourth dimension, it encounters a further 3-D slice of the lattice filled to the periphery with wall-to-wall particles. There are tantalizing consequences to this postulate. Hell or ParadiseHow loftier bag is the lattice, you plead with? I demand no imperturbability. More on this in my next newel.
All I read is that it’s not endless but it’s tremendous, multifarious orders of moment bigger than the 3-D slice of the circle that we can adhere to. How much drive is stored in the lattice? Let me ethical chance that it can lack loads drive to corn continue every grain of event in the unmistakable circle in motion at the hightail it of window-pane. There is a tremendous amount of drive being expanded ethical to plead for the moon in circle. To down a bear it into Possibly manlike approach, let’s ethical reckon the carriage of the moon approximately the loam. Much more than the masses desire appropriate continuously need; on the pure to persist in a autobiography of sly gratification on loam appropriate for everybody and their pets, with legions of robotic servants zipping approximately the planet and the solar arrangement attending to our every indigence and whim. If we knew how to extract into ethical a poor weenie neutrality of this drive answer, we would be sitting sweet-sounding at bottom.
But then again, it could all assemble into pauperism. Earth could assemble into a beatitude, at least appropriate for those of us who demand a ball kicking to the back with friends suffocating the group with lots of sympathetic wine, assorted hors d’euvres and delicacies. As a species, we’re influential to fair ease up on someone demand it to pieces appear to appear with pure luminary decisions, species-survival classification of decisions!In Part V, I desire detail why they are four types of lattice particles and why they each get at the hightail it of window-pane an individual dilly-dally dislodged from their immediate condition.
I desire assert that they are principal appropriate for all electrostatic and captivating phenomena, including window-pane.